Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKac, Gilberto
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Charles D.
dc.contributor.authorMatias, Susana L.
dc.contributor.authorMridha, Malay K.
dc.contributor.authorDewey, Kathryn G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T06:44:02Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T06:44:02Z
dc.date.copyright2019
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.citationKac, G., Arnold, C. D., Matias, S. L., Mridha, M. K., & Dewey, K. G. (2019). Gestational weight gain and newborn anthropometric outcomes in rural Bangladesh. Maternal & child nutrition, 15(4), e12816. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12816en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/16523
dc.descriptionThis article was published in Maternal Child Nutrition [ © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12816. The Journal's website is at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ftr/10.1111/mcn.12816en_US
dc.description.abstractLow gestational weight gain (GWG) is a known predictor of fetal growth restriction in higher income countries, but there is little information on this association in lower income countries. Our objective is to describe the association between GWG and birth outcomes among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. Pregnant women were identified in a community-based programme and enrolled into the study at an average of 13 weeks' gestation (n = 4,011). Maternal weight and height were measured at enrolment, maternal weight was measured at 36 weeks' gestation, and newborns were measured after birth. Rate of GWG (g/weeks) was calculated, and women were categorized as having adequate or inadequate GWG (Institute of Medicine recommendations). Newborn anthropometric outcomes included weight-for-age z score (WAZ), length-for-age z score (LAZ), head-circumference-for-age z score (HCZ), body mass index (BMI)-for-age z score (BMIZ), low birthweight (LBW < 2,500 g), WAZ < −2, LAZ < −2, HCZ < −2, BMIZ < −2, and small for gestational age (SGA: <10th percentile). Multivariate models were adjusted for confounders. Only 26% of the 2,562 women in these analyses had adequate GWG. Compared with newborns of women with inadequate GWG, infants of women with adequate GWG had a lower risk of adverse anthropometric outcomes (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: LBW = 0.68 [0.59, 0.80], LAZ < −2 = 0.64 [0.51, 0.80], HCZ < −2 = 0.75 [0.60, 0.93], BMIZ < −2 = 0.70 [0.59, 0.83], and SGA = 0.80 [0.73, 0.86]), but there was no significant difference in mean (SE) duration of gestation, 39.7 (0.08) versus 39.7 (0.05) weeks. In this population, GWG rate is a strong predictor of newborn anthropometric outcomes, but not duration of gestation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWiley Online Libraryen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ftr/10.1111/mcn.12816
dc.subjectBody mass indexen_US
dc.subjectGestational ageen_US
dc.subjectGestational weight gainen_US
dc.subjectLow birthweighten_US
dc.subjectSmall for gestational ageen_US
dc.subjectStuntingen_US
dc.titleGestational weight gain and newborn anthropometric outcomes in rural Bangladeshen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionPublished
dc.contributor.departmentBrac James P. Grant School of Public Health
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12816
dc.relation.journalMaternal Child Nutrition


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record