dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Farhaan Uddin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-15T05:51:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-15T05:51:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, F. U. (2015). Right to be forgotten: a critique of the post-Costeja Gonzalez paradigm. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21 (6), 175-185. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1357-3128 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/6839 | |
dc.description | This article was published in the Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Law Review [©2015] | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Considers the challenges of administering the "right to be forgotten" (RTBF) as formulated by the ECJ ruling in Google Spain SL v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) (C-131/12) and the draft General Data Protection Regulation art.17. Discusses the possible unintentional consequences of the RTBF, including the "Streisand effect" whereby suppressed information attracts popular attention. Suggests a framework for managing RTBF requests. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | © 2015 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Censorship | en_US |
dc.subject | Data protection | en_US |
dc.subject | EU law | en_US |
dc.subject | Right to be forgotten | en_US |
dc.subject | Search engines | en_US |
dc.subject | Websites | en_US |
dc.title | Right to be forgotten: a critique of the post-Costeja Gonzalez paradigm | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | |