Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZaman, Tabassum
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-19T08:33:56Z
dc.date.available2010-10-19T08:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/575
dc.description.abstractTraditionally any autobiographic writing is expected to document past in retrospect just like history. But memoirs like Michael Ondaatje’s Running in the Family and Sheila Ortiz Taylor and Sandra Ortiz Taylor’s Imaginary Parents go against this traditional expectation both in form and content and while doing so they question the traditional idea of autobiographic writing as well as history. Through the atypical way they search for truth these memoirs have made us re consider the traditional expectation from this genre. While reconstructing the respective family history these two books deconstruct the general understanding of documented history as a centripetal, teleological narrative, something that projects absolute, objective reality.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBRAC University Journal, BRAC University;Vol.3. No. 2 pp. 93-99
dc.subjectLife writingen_US
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.subjectFictionen_US
dc.subjectTruthen_US
dc.subjectMulti Perspectiveen_US
dc.titleLife writing: Straddling fact and fictionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record