Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMostakim, Moin
dc.contributor.authorShayer, Mirza Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorAnjum, Nafisha
dc.contributor.authorMim, Sushana Islam
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Md. Abu Sajid
dc.contributor.authorPreoshi, Noshin Nanjiba Islam
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T05:15:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-13T05:15:14Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.identifier.otherID: 18101496
dc.identifier.otherID: 18301217
dc.identifier.otherID: 18101579
dc.identifier.otherID: 18101013
dc.identifier.otherID: 18101002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/17644
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, 2022.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 47-50).
dc.description.abstractIn today’s modern society, image generation (synthesis) has a great number of uses in various tasks. Image generation is used in crime forensics, improving image quality and generating better images. In 2014, a scientific breakthrough occurred in the machine learning community when Ian Goodfellow and his colleagues introduced the GAN (Generative Adversarial Network). Ever since then, GANs have become a more popular concept in the scientific community. Even today, GANs are being used, utilized and upgraded. This thesis is a comparative study of two GANs used for generating images of cars- DC-GAN (Deep Convolution) and VS-GAN (Vehicle Synthesis). The study will determine which of the two is better suited to generate high quality images of cars. We will train both GANs using the same dataset. The dataset consists of about 16185 Google images of random cars, 8144 for training and another 8041 for testing. The dataset is already preprocessed and split. We will compare the GANs training times, losses, accuracies and pictures generated, showing how well they perform. We will run all the GANs for 40 epochs in both training and testing. We will compare the CGAN, DCGAN, VSGAN, WGAN and WGAN-GP, to see which performs the best. We have used K-Nearest Neighbors, Regression and Random Forest Classifier to calculate the accuracies of all the GANs. We have displayed the results in tabular and graphical formats. We believe this will improve GAN research by providing an excellent comparison between the GANs and determine which is better suited for the given task. We also hope to improve the models further in the future and make an even more in depth comparison between the GAN architectures.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMirza Ahmad Shayer
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNafisha Anjum
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySushana Islam Mim
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMd. Abu Sajid Chowdhury
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNoshin Nanjiba Islam Preoshi
dc.format.extent50 Pages
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBrac Universityen_US
dc.rightsBrac University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectImage generationen_US
dc.subjectGANen_US
dc.subjectCGANen_US
dc.subjectDCGANen_US
dc.subjectVSGANen_US
dc.subjectWGANen_US
dc.subjectWGANGPen_US
dc.subjectEpochsen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectTestingen_US
dc.subjectK Nearest Neighborsen_US
dc.subjectRegressionen_US
dc.subjectRandom Forest Classifieren_US
dc.subject.lcshImage processing--Digital techniques
dc.titleA comparative study of car image generation quality using DCGAN and VSGANen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Brac University
dc.description.degreeB. Computer Science and Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record