Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSiddiqee, Mahbubul H.
dc.contributor.authorShumona, Fatema Tuj Johora
dc.contributor.authorQasem, Humaira
dc.contributor.authorMonami, Humaira Tasnim
dc.contributor.authorNoor, Fariha Ferdousi
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T04:42:07Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T04:42:07Z
dc.date.copyright2020
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.otherID: 16126003
dc.identifier.otherID: 16126015
dc.identifier.otherID: 15226009
dc.identifier.otherID: 14326002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/14805
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Microbiology, 2020.en_US
dc.descriptionCatalogued from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 109-111).
dc.description.abstractDiarrhea is one of the leading causes of infant mortality in developing countries like Bangladesh. This study aims to detect the presence of fecal coliform in the supplied water and treated water in the households of Dhaka city. The samples were collected from October 2018 till August 2019. The samples were further subjected to PCR to detect the presence of diarrheagenic E.coli. Nine primer pairs were used detect the five diarrheagenic strains of E.coli (EPEC, EHEC, ETEC, EAEC and EIEC). Fecal coliform counts produced by supplied water samples and treated water samples were categorized into the following: 0 count, 1-5 count, 6-30 count, 31-100 count, >100 count. Fecal coliform was not detected in 29.46% of the supplied water samples. On the other hand, 18.26% of the supplied water samples produced a fecal coliform count of greater than 100. 12.86% of supplied water samples have a count varying between 1 to 5, 27.81% of the samples have a 6 to 30 fecal coliform count and 11.62% of the samples have 31 to 100 fecal coliform count. ETEC was detected in 14.94% of the samples while EHEC was detected in 12.24% of the supplied water samples. 3.94% of the supplied water samples had EAEC. EPEC and EIEC were detected in 1.45% of the supplied water samples only. 52.62% of the treated water samples did not produce any fecal coliform count, while 1.65% of the treated water samples had a fecal coliform count greater than 100. 14.88%, 21.49% and 9.37% of the treated water samples had a fecal coliform count of 1-5, 6-30 and 31-100 respectively. ETEC, EHEC and EAEC were detected in 3.03%, 2.75% and 0.83% of the treated water samples respectively. EPEC and EIEC were not detected in the treated water samples.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFatema Tuj Johora Shumona
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHumaira Qasem
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHumaira Tasnim Monami
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFariha Ferdousi Noor
dc.format.extent112 Pages
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBrac Universityen_US
dc.rightsBrac University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectDiarrheagenic Escherichia colien_US
dc.subjectEPECen_US
dc.subjectETECen_US
dc.subjectEHECen_US
dc.subjectEIEC and EAECen_US
dc.subjectDhaka cityen_US
dc.subjectHousehold wateren_US
dc.subjectSupplied wateren_US
dc.subjectTreated wateren_US
dc.titlePrevalence of pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence genes in raw and domestically treated waters in Dhaka city: An overlooked health hazard analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brac University
dc.description.degreeB. Microbiology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record