Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHadi, Abdullahel
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19T04:51:19Z
dc.date.available2019-12-19T04:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2000-03
dc.identifier.citationHadi, A. (2000, March). Bhairab bridge project: assessment of the implementation of social action plan. Research Reports (2000): Social Studies, Vol – XXVI, 81–110.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/13317
dc.description.abstractFor construction of the Bhairab-Ashuganj Bridge, the government acquired land on both sides of the Meghna river that affected the owners of small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) and their employees in the area. To remedy the possible negative impact, a Social Action Plan (SAP) was prepared to ensure that affected persons receive appropriate compensation and other support to reconstitute their livelihoods. Christian Commission for Development in Bangladesh (CCDB) was given the responsibility to implement the plan. The purpose of this monitoring was to assesses the achievements in implementing the plan, identifies weaknesses, if any, and recommends remedial measures. Several approaches such as review of documents, survey of the affected persons and rapid appraisals with stakeholders were used to monitor the implementation of SAP. The monitoring data were collected in February-March 2000. The monitoring report covers various aspects of compensation payments and grievance resolution mechanisms of the plan. The achievement of the project was poor and insignificant at the time of monitoring. The progress of the implementation of SAP was very slow. In Bhairab side, of the 2,374 project affected persons (PAPs) identified by CCDB, only 102 were compensated, 20 cases were ready for approval but not paid, and 54 cases were in the process. In Ashuganj, no payment was made but 154 cases were ready for payment, 200 were sent to Dhaka for clearance, and 94 cases were in the process. No indication of inconsistency between the official and actual payments and no incidence of deduction from payments were found. However, all affected persons had to pay extra-money in various occasions to receive payments. CCDB never demanded extra-money but asked affected persons to submit supporting documents. Most of the affected-persons expressed their dissatisfaction about the performance of CCDB. They had to spend many workdays to collect necessary documents. Each wage labourer, on average, had to pay about Tk. 450 to receive Tk. 2,400. The Project Compensation Policy (PCP) was generally followed in calculating the amount of compensation defined in the SAP. The affected persons were unhappy about the calculation procedure, felt that the value of land was heavily under-estimated and demanded actual market value for the acquired property. The provision of paying Tk. 2,400 for losing job regardless of the type of employment created a negative image on RHD and CCDB.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED)en_US
dc.subjectBhairab bridgeen_US
dc.subjectSmall and medium size enterprises (SMEs)en_US
dc.subjectSocial Action Plan (SAP)en_US
dc.subjectChristian Commission for Development in Bangladesh (CCDB)en_US
dc.subjectBRACen_US
dc.subject.lcshRoads -- Bangladesh.
dc.titleBhairab bridge project: assessment of the implementation of social action planen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record