A systematic review: Pharmacological treatment of borderline personality disorder
Loading...
Date
Publisher
BRAC University
Authors
Citation
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterised by marked instability of mood, recurrent
impulsive acts, a poorly consolidated sense of self, and chronic interpersonal dysfunction.
Evidence-based psychotherapies, mainly dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and mentalization based
treatment (MBT) form the backbone of treatment, yet pharmacological agents are frequently
co-prescribed to target affective dysregulation, impulsivity, and aggression. No single agent holds
regulatory approval for BPD, and the evidence base underpinning current prescribing is limited
and inconsistent. This review consolidates findings from 14 controlled trials conducted between
2011 and 2026, encompassing four pharmacological categories: second-generation antipsychotics,
opioid receptor antagonists, mood-stabilising compounds, and a miscellaneous group comprising
ketamine, psilocybin, omega-3 fatty acids, inhaled loxapine, oxytocin, and citalopram.
Methodological rigor was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias framework. Trial quality was
predominantly low to moderate. Brexpiprazole and low-dose quetiapine yielded the most
encouraging efficacy signals for core BPD pathology, whereas lamotrigine conferred no detectable
benefit in the best-powered trial identified. Opioid antagonists showed preliminary signal for
attenuating dissociative symptoms, and investigational agents such as ketamine and psilocybin
warrant evaluation in larger, more rigorous studies. Well-powered, prospectively registered trials
with harmonised outcome measures are urgently needed.
LC Subject Headings
Description
This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Pharmacy, 2026.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 36-38).
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 36-38).
Publisher Link
Department
Type
Thesis
Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International