Welcome to the upgraded BRAC University Institutional Repository. We are currently organizing collections after a recent system upgrade. Homepage category counters may temporarily show lower numbers while syncing, but over 27,000 repository items remain safe and accessible. Please use the search bar to find theses, scholarly outputs, and institutional documents.

Isolation and identification of respiratory pathogen from sputum sample assessment antibiotics resistance: single centered cross sectional study

bracu.degree.levelUndergraduate
bracu.type.groupStudent Works
datacite.rightsOpen Access
dc.contributor.advisorHaque , Fahim Kabir Monjurul
dc.contributor.authorLabony, Adhara Zaman
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-11T06:27:55Z
dc.date.available2025-03-11T06:27:55Z
dc.date.copyright2024
dc.date.issued2024-11
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Biotechnology, 2024.en_US
dc.descriptionCatalogued from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 32-34).
dc.description.abstractRespiratory tract infections are general health threats that are magnified by increased cases of antibiotic resistance. The purpose of this study was to isolate respiratory pathogens from sputum samples to determine their resistance profile in a single center cross sectional study. In all, 909 samples (indoor and outdoor patients) were analyzed by standard microbiological techniques and the AST was performed. Among 909 samples,413 growth were found where 195(47.32%) were Klebsiella pneumonia and 183(44.31%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These were the two most common causative organisms in the study. Furthermore, we also found about 7.58% of cases (31) to be Streptococcus, 0.24% of cases (2) to be Escherichia coli , 0.24% of cases(1) to be Staphylococcus and the same for antibacterial. A thorough analysis was performed on data collected from June of 2024 to August of the same year. The present study emphasizes the importance of periodic screening of resistance profiles ensuring that health professionals adhere to appropriate antibiotics prescription to curb the resistant strains. For example, Klebsiella Sensitivity of amikacin was 71.79% but its resistance of piperacillin was 29.23%. Similarly, Pseudomonas resistance trend for Piperacillin was also similar to Klebsiella which was 29.23% and for Meropenem the resistance showed 13.11% which was very alarming. Again, Pseudomonas showed strong effectiveness for amikacin which was around 71.79% sensitive. Thus, according to our findings, the most effective antibiotics are Amikacin, Gentamicin and Meropenem which showed high efficacy for our researched organisms. In contrast, the least effective antibiotics are Clindamycin, Cefixime, Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin which faced widespread resistance, inhibiting their utility in severe infections. This work adds important baseline information to aid health professionals in clinical management and infection prevention planning.en_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Biotechnology
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAdhara Zaman Labony
dc.format.extent34 pages
dc.identifier.otherID 19236015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/25691
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Universityen_US
dc.rightsBRAC University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectRespiratory tract infectionsen_US
dc.subjectStandard microbiological techniquesen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotics sensitivity test (AST)en_US
dc.subject.lcshAntibiotic resistance
dc.subject.lcshMultidrug resistance
dc.titleIsolation and identification of respiratory pathogen from sputum sample assessment antibiotics resistance: single centered cross sectional studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
19236015_MNS.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: