Deconstructing the “writing back” motif with Abdulrazak Gurnah’s Paradise and Jean Rhys’ Wide Sargasso Sea: Can postcolonial writers dismantle colonial literary narratives?
| bracu.degree.level | Undergraduate | |
| bracu.type.group | Student Works | |
| datacite.rights | Open Access | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mowtushi, Mahruba | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dhaly, Sajal Hossain | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of English and Humanities | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-17T11:34:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-17T11:34:09Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-06 | |
| dc.description | This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in English, 2026. | |
| dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. | |
| dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (pages 57-59). | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this research is to discern whether Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea and Abdulrazak Gurnah’s Paradise are “writing back” to the English and European colonial empires and their literary canons, specifically to Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre and Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Foundational postcolonial literary theories from books and academic journals provide context to the efficacy of Rhys and Gurnah’s writing back: such as Edward Said’s Orientalism, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s idea of the Subaltern, and Homi K. Bhabha’s concept of mimicry. Furthermore, the research also relies on Chinua Achebe’s theory of abrogation and appropriation of the English language as a means of resistance and taking back agency by the colonised subjects. Upon assessing these books, book chapters, and articles, the research finds that Rhys and Gurnah are in fact not writing back to any colonial empire or writer; Rhys writes for a feminist Creole identity, and Gurnah writes to help establish the African literary tradition. | |
| dc.description.degree | Bachelor of Arts in English | |
| dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Sajal Hossain Dhaly | |
| dc.format.extent | 60 pages | |
| dc.identifier.other | ID 22203067 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10361/29225 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | BRAC University | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights | BRAC University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Postcolonialism | |
| dc.subject | Jean Rhys | |
| dc.subject | Abdulrazak Gurnah | |
| dc.subject | Orientalism | |
| dc.subject | Wide Sargasso Sea | |
| dc.subject | Paradise | |
| dc.subject | Postcolonial literature | |
| dc.subject | Imperialism | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Gurnah, Abdulrazak, 1948---Criticism and interpretation. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Rhys, Jean, 1890-1979--Criticism and interpretation. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Imperialism in literature. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Postcolonialism in literature. | |
| dc.title | Deconstructing the “writing back” motif with Abdulrazak Gurnah’s Paradise and Jean Rhys’ Wide Sargasso Sea: Can postcolonial writers dismantle colonial literary narratives? | |
| dc.type | Thesis |