Welcome to the upgraded BRAC University Institutional Repository. We are currently organizing collections after a recent system upgrade. Homepage category counters may temporarily show lower numbers while syncing, but over 27,000 repository items remain safe and accessible. Please use the search bar to find theses, scholarly outputs, and institutional documents.

A comparative study on gateway selection in IoT

bracu.type.groupResearch Publications
datacite.rightsMetadata Only
dc.contributor.authorRitu, Ananya
dc.contributor.authorTanha, Pohali Mahjabin
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Wasema Nooren
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Sumaiya
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarty, Amitabha
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T09:38:06Z
dc.date.available2026-07-09T09:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-07
dc.description.abstractDue to the growing application of IoT some crucial challenges have emerged in this sector such as maximizing throughput, minimizing energy consumption of the gateways and balancing loads among the gateways efficiently. This paper conducts a comparative analysis among a few of the most innovative and promising gateway selection models to find out which of these models are relatively more effective to tackle the above-mentioned challenges in IoT. For our research, Game Theory Gateway Selection (GTGWS), Taxi-Sharing, Floyd-Warshall Minimax (FWM) Algorithm and Evolved Reliability and Traffic-aware Gateway Selection (ERTGS) model were studied and tested under two distinguished network conditions - different 'demand' of the end devices different 'number' of end devices connected to the gateway. Results were obtained for various evaluation criteria such as throughput, load balancing and energy consumption. The result showed that one specific model cannot excel at tackling all the challenges. Each model has its own strength that can be utilized for different network priorities. Among them, ERTGS managed to surpass others in two areas which are low energy consumption and high throughput. The working principle of the models, comparison and analysis among them are discussed in details in this paper.
dc.description.versionPublished
dc.format.extent90-95
dc.identifier.citationA. Ritu, P. M. Tanha, W. N. Islam, S. Islam and A. Chakrabarty, "A Comparative Study on Gateway Selection in IoT," 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India, 2020, pp. 90-95, doi: 10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243591.
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243591
dc.identifier.issn9781728154640
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85097813038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10361/28503
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.relation.hasversion10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243591
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Iot in Social Mobile Analytics and Cloud Ismac 2020
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Iot in Social Mobile Analytics and Cloud Ismac 2020
dc.relation.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9243591
dc.rightsfalse
dc.subjectEfficiency
dc.subjectEnergy-consumption
dc.subjectERTGS
dc.subjectFWM
dc.subjectGateway selection
dc.subjectGTGWS
dc.subjectIoT
dc.subjectLoad-balancing
dc.subjectTaxi-sharing
dc.subjectThroughput
dc.subject.lcshPower resources.
dc.subject.lcshInternet of things.
dc.subject.lcshTransportation.
dc.titleA comparative study on gateway selection in IoT
dc.typeConference Proceeding
person.affiliation.nameBRAC University
person.affiliation.nameBRAC University
person.affiliation.nameBRAC University
person.affiliation.nameBRAC University
person.affiliation.nameBRAC University
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57220897643
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57220895374
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57220890692
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57213340325
person.identifier.scopus-author-id35108854200

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Demo.jpg
Size:
27.28 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: