Image forgery detection comparison between MobileNetV2 and VGG16 convolutional neural networks

bracu.degree.levelUndergraduate
bracu.type.groupStudent Works
datacite.rightsOpen Access
dc.contributor.advisorUddin, Jia
dc.contributor.authorNandy, Aritra
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Md. Mustakim
dc.contributor.authorSayad, Abu Bakar Md
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Imteenan Akhter
dc.contributor.authorAnindita, Amina Azad
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T09:08:52Z
dc.date.available2025-09-29T09:08:52Z
dc.date.copyright2020
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 31-34).
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, 2020.en_US
dc.description.abstractAs there are an immense scope of useful assets to alter images now, the requirement for confirming the authenticity of images is more necessary than any time in recent memory. While forgery techniques are progressively getting better that even human perception appears quite difficult to perceive these changes, regular algorithms, which attempt to identify altering patterns, frequently pre-define suppositions that restrict the extent of issue. In this manner, such strategies fail to detect forgery strategies in computer programs. Inside the following publication, we initiate structure which uses Machine Learning methods to distinguish forged photos. Consequently, the MobileNetV2 network in [40] is altered with the goal that it very well may be well equipped to the goal of image forgery identification. It is contended by the rest spatial measurements of initial layers, the system is probably going to learn prominent highlights in these layers, and afterward succeeding layers are to extract these prominent highlights and coming to a conclusion determining an image is tampered. Furthermore, by our e orts we additionally lead an extensive examination to demonstrate those contentions. Exploratory outcomes show that this architecture-modified system accomplishes an amazing accuracy of 93.15%, which outperforms VGG16 neural network on which the previously defined system depends with a margin of healthy amount up to 10.05%.en_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Computer Science
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAritra Nandy
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMd. Mustakim Hasan
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAbu Bakar Md Sayad
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityImteenan Akhter Khan
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmina Azad Anindita
dc.format.extent43 pages
dc.identifier.otherID 16101315
dc.identifier.otherID 16110018
dc.identifier.otherID 15301115
dc.identifier.otherID 15301008
dc.identifier.otherID 13310004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/26806
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Universityen_US
dc.rightsBRAC University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectMobileNetV2en_US
dc.subjectVGG16en_US
dc.subjectCopy-move forgeryen_US
dc.subjectSplicing forgeryen_US
dc.subjectPicture tamperingen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectCNNen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.subjectImage forgery detectionen_US
dc.subject.lcshForgeries--Prevention.
dc.subject.lcshNeural networks (Computer science).
dc.subject.lcshImage processing.
dc.subject.lcshDeepfakes--Identification.
dc.titleImage forgery detection comparison between MobileNetV2 and VGG16 convolutional neural networksen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
16101315, 16110018, 15301115, 15301008, 13310004_CSE.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: