Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorYesmin, Sakila
dc.contributor.advisorTalagala, Dr. Indrani
dc.contributor.authorParvin, Nahid
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-27T05:23:31Z
dc.date.available2018-03-27T05:23:31Z
dc.date.copyright2014
dc.date.issued2014-04-30
dc.identifier.otherID 12155008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/9747
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Early Child Development, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 47 - 50).
dc.description.abstractCorporal punishment is a common phenomenon in Bangladeshi schools. On 13 January, 2011 The High Court division of The Supreme Court issued a ruling on prohibiting of corporal punishment. Subsequently, The Ministry of Education published a circular stating that corporal punishment is prohibited in schools. Despite the prohibiting, newspaper and some research revealed that the practice of corporal punishment is still remaining in schools. A study report of BLAST showed 77.1% students were inflicted corporal punishment in their schools (Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children, 2012). The aim of this study was to explore teachers', parents' and children's perception towards corporal punishment in urban settings. An In-depth Interview-based, qualitative approach was carried out to collect data for the study. In this study, four children (2 girls and2 boys) aged 6-8 years studying in grades one and two were selected from two Government and a non- Government primary schools. The other participants were the parents of these children and their teachers. All participants were selected through the convenient sampling technique. Twelve IDIs were conducted with twelve participants (4 teachers, 4 parents and 4 children). Data were analyzed according to the content analysis approach' The findings revealed that there were mixed perceptions come out from the participants towards corporal punishment in schools. More than half of the participants (parents and teachers) perceived that corporal punishment is necessary to maintain discipline in the classroom, because it is the easiest way to manage overcrowded classrooms as well as it is useful for better academic achievements. But they suggested using it more lightly. The rest of participants believed that corporal punishment would not be needed to maintain discipline. The perception of children was that corporal punishment is not a good method, because punishment is shameful and painful for everyone. Most of the children feel embarrassed when they are punished. Study results indicated that when teachers fail to control class, they use corporal punishment as well as when children talk with each other in the classroom, make noises, do not bring their homework, disobey the teacher, violate teacher's orders, tell lies, repeat mistakes then children are subjected to corporal punishment. Study also revealed some other factors like large class, poor salary, low level ofjob satisfaction, heavy workload including other administrative work and traditional thinking of corporal punishment that indirectly stimulate teachers for applying corporal punishment. The findings of the study showed that almost all of the participants were aware of the negative effects of corporal punishment, but most of them perceived that corporal punishment is one of the most effective disciplining measures in schools that work immediately. For using of corporal punishment, children might show disrespect to teachers, lose their selfconfidence and lose their interest that could be lead to poor learning as well as absenteeism and dropout rate might be increased. The result also identified some possible alternative options to maintain discipline such as small class sizes, co-teacher for large classes, talk to children, counseling, listen to them and value them as well as teach them in interesting ways in a child friendly learning environment. In conclusion, corporal punished should be stopped and teachers should be trained on creating supportive environment for learners and classroom management without using corporal punishment. The study made some recommendations that the government to make explicit the rule of prohibiting corporal punishment in legislation as well as to provide teachers training on classroom management and alternative strategies to control discipline problems in school. The study suggested for further studies to identify the current practice of corporal punishment after banning in both urban and rural context. The other research would be required on how teachers can use alternative methods other than corporal punishment. Awareness raising is essential since corporal punishment is a violation of the rights of children.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNahid Parvin
dc.format.extent58 pages
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Univeristyen_US
dc.rightsBRAC University thesis reports are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectPunishmenten_US
dc.subjectPrimary schoolen_US
dc.subjectPrimary educationen_US
dc.titleCorporal punishment in urban primary school settingsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Education Development, BRAC University
dc.description.degreeM. Early Child Development


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record