Progress in procedural justice: tunnelling through the maze

dc.contributor.author	Jahangir, Nadim
dc.contributor.author	Haq, Mahmudul
dc.contributor.author	Ahmed, Ezaz
dc.date.accessioned	2010-10-14T13:53:04Z
dc.date.available	2010-10-14T13:53:04Z
dc.date.issued	2005
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10361/527
dc.description.abstract	Recent developments in the contribution to the literature on procedural justice have opened avenues for exploring the subject and gaining perspective in the field with a view to assessing how the concept of procedural justice has evolved over the periods and how it is shaping up for the future. This paper reviews the procedural justice literature since 1990. Four theories exploring procedural justice are presented. The antecedents, consequences, and contexts for procedural justice effects are reviewed. This study reveals that attention to matters relating to procedural justice need to be practiced in the foreseeable future.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	BRAC University	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	BRAC University Journal, BRAC University;Vol.2, No.1,pp. 13-31
dc.subject	Job satisfaction	en_US
dc.subject	Motivation	en_US
dc.subject	Procedural justice	en_US
dc.subject	Organizational commitment	en_US
dc.subject	Fairness perception	en_US
dc.title	Progress in procedural justice: tunnelling through the maze	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US