Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFatima Tuz Zahra
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-12T05:44:07Z
dc.date.available2013-06-12T05:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/2601
dc.description.abstractThe aim of higher education is to pursue learning for its own sake and to develop specialist skills. However due to market pressure higher education institutions in Bangladesh and across the world have had to focus on practical skills rather than inculcating a desire for knowledge. There is more emphasis to secure jobs than making students curious about knowledge and learning. Alongside this pragmatic approach there is a lot of importance given to critical thinking skills in the higher education curriculum. However, despite its centrality in the curricula most academic institutions follow a simplistic form of teaching critical thinking skills, which focus on the skill of breaking down arguments into its parts and ignores modes of thought which might facilitate solutions. This paper looks at the elements of critical thinking as it applies to the educational practices in higher education institutions in Bangladesh, and how the classical art of rhetoric, manifested in the extracurricular activity of debate, functions towards rote reproduction rather than initiating the process to think critically.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBRAC University Journal, BRAC University;Vol. 9, No. 1 & 2, 2012, p. 37-45
dc.subjectCritical thinking skillsen_US
dc.subjectCurriculaen_US
dc.subjectPedagogyen_US
dc.subjectRote learningen_US
dc.titleA perspective on critical thinking, debate, higher education in Bangladeshen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record