Mapping out factors that shape narratives of bodily autonomy for Bangladeshi youth
Abstract
The discourse of consent, specifically the consent of our bodies is hyper-focused on situational
narratives of consent breach. While the scope of this discourse fills a crucial role which
formulates preventative guidelines and suggests disciplinary measures, it overlooks the
uniqueness of subjective experiences for the sake of extracting objectivity. As a result, current
discourse fails to take into account the nuances and ambiguities that come into play when
shaping these narratives. Firstly, it homogenizes the capability of individuals to effectively
understand and communicate their boundaries, and how their personal experiences with bodily
autonomy and agency in the past affect their psyche. Secondly, it presents boundaries as rigid
peripheries defined as required by negating their malleability and adaptability. Thirdly, it does
not concern itself with how individuals negotiate the boundaries of their body to navigate
experiences where their autonomy is challenged. This thesis is an autoethnography extended
towards a peer group- it explores narratives of bodily autonomy of upper-middle class
Bangladeshi youth with the aim of mapping out factors that shaped their experiences.