Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRahman, Atiya
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharjee, Anindita
dc.contributor.authorDas, Narayan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T06:19:59Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T06:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/23796
dc.descriptionThis article was published in The Review of Development Economics [©2021 Rights managed by Wiley] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12809 The Article's website is at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rode.12809en_US
dc.description.abstractExisting evidence shows that programs that provide grants to productive assets along with training to very poor women increase labor supply, earnings, and consumption. In contrast, evidence on the effect of microcredit on these outcomes is mixed. In this paper, we examine the effect of a hybrid of the two approaches—credit and grant—on the livelihoods of the ultra-poor in Bangladesh. A randomized evaluation of the hybrid intervention shows that it increases labor supply of working-age women, household income, productive assets, savings, and consumption expenditures. The benefit–cost ratio of the intervention is estimated to be 8.47.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectUltra-pooren_US
dc.subjectSkills trainingen_US
dc.subjectMicrocrediten_US
dc.subjectCredit and grantsen_US
dc.titleA good mix against ultra-poverty? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Bangladeshen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record