Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHossain , M.Mahboob
dc.contributor.advisorJilani , Md.Shariful Alam
dc.contributor.authorParvin, Syeda Adeeba
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T03:42:23Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T03:42:23Z
dc.date.copyright2024
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.identifier.otherID 18136086
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/23757
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Biotechnology, 2024.en_US
dc.descriptionCatalogued from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 38-41).
dc.description.abstractA Gram-positive bacterium, Staphylococcus aureus, a microorganism present in the nasal passages of approximately 30% of individuals and on the skin of around 20% is responsible for a diverse range of clinical illnesses. Reputed as the most perilous among the numerous common types of staphylococcus aureus bacteria which often cause skin infections. One of the global public health issues is managing the infections of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is quite challenging for its resistance to many antibiotics. MLSB antibiotics, including macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B, are frequently employed in the treatment of MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). The resistance to these MLSB antibiotics among MRSA is increasing which can occur through efflux mechanisms or through inducible or constitutive resistance mechanisms. The pathogen is often treated by clindamycin whereas overuse of these antibiotics can increase the likelihood of acquiring inducible clindamycin resistance, leading to therapeutic failure and D-test is a necessity to detect such resistance. The objective of this study was to identify inducible clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains among both Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates. Therefore, a total of 200 clinical samples (wound swabs, pus, urine, blood) were collected from October 2022 to July 2023, from a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka city, out of which 48% were MRSA both phenotypically and genotypically. Inducible resistance was found among 64 (32%) isolates, and constitutive resistance in 53 (26.5%). MRSA had higher inducible (50%) and constitutive resistance (31.2%) than MSSA strains (15.3%, and 22.1% respectively). Female patients exhibited a higher prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance (82.8%), as well as inpatients (87%). All strains showing inducible clindamycin resistance demonstrated 100% sensitivity to vancomycin. The study indicates that implementing the D-test as a standard procedure in routine disc diffusion testing is essential to prevent treatment failures.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySyeda Adeeba Parvin
dc.format.extent69 pages
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrac Universityen_US
dc.rightsBrac University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectMRSAen_US
dc.subjectMSSAen_US
dc.subjectInducible clindamycinen_US
dc.subjectD-testen_US
dc.titleDetection of inducible clindamycin resistance in methicillin-resistant and -susceptible staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital of Dhaka Cityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brac University
dc.description.degreeB. Biotechnology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record