Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBin Naser, Dr. Iftekhar
dc.contributor.authorPrapti, Jarin Tusnim
dc.contributor.authorSumaiya, Kazi
dc.contributor.authorMaliha, Farhat
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T09:25:27Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08T09:25:27Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.otherID: 17136016
dc.identifier.otherID: 17336006
dc.identifier.otherID: 17336009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/18244
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Biotechnology 2022.en_US
dc.descriptionCatalogued from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 59-65).
dc.description.abstractAntibiotic resistance has been on the rise for many years now. Multidrug resistance patterns in Gramnegative and Gram-positive bacterial strains are difficult to cure and might even be untreatable with conventional synthetic antibiotics. Furthermore, there is a shortage of novel antibiotics in the market. Therefore, to combat global health crisis, development of new treatment options and alternative antimicrobial therapies, preferably from natural sources, are essential. Oregano (Origanum vulgare L) essential oil (OEO) is known to have antibacterial properties and this study was aimed to find its ability to inhibit the growth of some infectious bacterial strains and also do a comparative analysis with a well-known antibacterial oil; Neem (Azadirachta indica) essential oil. This study on antibacterial activity against selected pathogens was carried out using Kill-time and Dosage dependent spread plate method. Klebsiella pneumonia, shigella, STEC, Salmonella typhi, Aeromonas hydrophila, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis was selected for this study. The study showed the average percentage inhibition of each oil is directly proportional with the dosage. OEO showed greater antibacterial activity against the bacterial strains as compared to NEO. For 50µl dosage the average inhibition rate for OEO was 73.3% and for NEO it was only 45.9%. NEO was less effective on bacterial strains; Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella, Aeromonas hydrophia, STEC, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis as compared to OEO. The only bacterial strain NEO was more effective on was Salmonella typhi. OEO demonstrated 100% inhibition against Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella, Aeromonas hydrophila, STEC, Staphylococcus Aureus and Enterococcus faecalis at varying dosage of oil. Whereas, NEO showed 100% inhibition against Salmonella typhi and Staphylococcus Aureus at 150µl and 200µl dosage of oil respectively.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJarin Tusnim Prapti
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKazi Sumaiya
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFarhat Maliha
dc.format.extent70 pages
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrac Universityen_US
dc.rightsBrac University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectOriganum vulgare Len_US
dc.subjectOEOen_US
dc.subjectAzadirachta indicaen_US
dc.subject.lcshPathogenic bacteria.
dc.titleAnti-bacterial effect of essential oil extracted from homegrown Origanum vulgare L and Azadirachta indica tree on pathogenic bacteriaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brac University
dc.description.degreeB. Biotechnology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record