A holistic approach to promoting early child development: A cluster randomised trial of a group-based, multicomponent intervention in rural Bangladesh
View/ Open
Date
2021-03-16Publisher
BMJ JournalsAuthor
Pitchik, Helen OTofail, Fahmida
Rahman, Mahbubur
Akter, Fahmida
Sultana, Jesmin
Shoab, Abul Kasham
Huda, Tarique Md. Nurul
Jahir, Tania
Amin, Md Ruhul
Hossain, Md Khobair
Das, Jyoti Bhushan
Chung, Esther O
Byrd, Kendra A
Yeasmin, Farzana
Kwong, Laura H
Forsyth, Jenna E
Mridha, Malay K
Winch, Peter J
Luby, Stephen P
Fernald, Lia CH
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Pitchik, H. O., Tofail, F., Rahman, M., Akter, F., Sultana, J., Shoab, A. K., . . . Fernald, L. C. H. (2021). A holistic approach to promoting early child development: A cluster randomised trial of a group-based, multicomponent intervention in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Global Health, 6(3) doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004307Abstract
Introduction In low- and middle-income countries,
children experience multiple risks for delayed development.
We evaluated a multicomponent, group-based early
child development intervention including behavioural
recommendations on responsive stimulation, nutrition,
water, sanitation, hygiene, mental health and lead exposure
prevention.
Methods We conducted a 9-month, parallel, multiarm, clusterrandomised controlled trial in 31 rural villages in Kishoreganj
District, Bangladesh. Villages were randomly allocated to:
group sessions (‘group’); alternating groups and home visits
(‘combined’); or a passive control arm. Sessions were delivered
fortnightly by trained community members. The primary
outcome was child stimulation (Family Care Indicators); the
secondary outcome was child development (Ages and Stages
Questionnaire Inventory, ASQi). Other outcomes included dietary
diversity, latrine status, use of a child potty, handwashing
infrastructure, caregiver mental health and knowledge of
lead. Analyses were intention to treat. Data collectors were
independent from implementers.
Results In July–August 2017, 621 pregnant women and
primary caregivers of children<15 months were enrolled
(group n=160, combined n=160, control n=301). At endline,
immediately following intervention completion (July–August
2018), 574 participants were assessed (group n=144,
combined n=149, control n=281). Primary caregivers in both
intervention arms participated in more play activities than
control caregivers (age-adjusted means: group 4.22, 95% CI
3.97 to 4.47; combined 4.77, 4.60 to 4.96; control 3.24, 3.05
to 3.39), and provided a larger variety of play materials (ageadjusted means: group 3.63, 3.31 to 3.96; combined 3.81, 3.62
to 3.99; control 2.48, 2.34 to 2.59). Compared with the control
arm, children in the group arm had higher total ASQi scores
(adjusted mean difference in standardised scores: 0.39, 0.15 to
0.64), while in the combined arm scores were not significantly
different from the control (0.25, –0.07 to 0.54).
Conclusion Our findings suggest that group-based,
multicomponent interventions can be effective at improving
child development outcomes in rural Bangladesh, and that
they have the potential to be delivered at scale.