Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChakrabarty, Amitabha
dc.contributor.authorShahriar, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorShuvo, Protick Sarker
dc.contributor.authorFahim, Md. Saidul Haque
dc.contributor.authorSordar, Md Sobuj
dc.contributor.authorHaque, Md Esadul
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-18T04:18:38Z
dc.date.available2022-05-18T04:18:38Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.identifier.otherID 20301476
dc.identifier.otherID 16301078
dc.identifier.otherID 16301053
dc.identifier.otherID 17301148
dc.identifier.otherID 16201032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/16633
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Engineering, 2022.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 32-35).
dc.description.abstractCassava is a high-protein and nutrient-dense plant, notably inside the leaves. Cassava is often used as a rice alternative. Pests, viruses, bacteria, and fungus may cause a variety of illnesses on cassava leaves. This study consists of four main diseases that commonly affect cassava leaves: Cassava Bacterial Blight (CBB), Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD), Cassava Green Mite (CGM), and Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD) and we took these four diseases as labels in our research. Furthermore, we took 22000 infected images from Kaggle and we have transformed our dataset into four different image transformation to ensure the accuracy of our model. These four different augmentations are Random Crop Augmentation, Random Flip Augmentation, Random Rotation Augmentation and Random Contrast Augmentation. Finally, we used six algorithms to detect the diseases of cassava leaves. These six algorithms are Xception, EfficientNetB0 Resnet50, VGG16 Densenet121, InceptionV3. While we operated these algorithms on our trained dataset, it gave diverse precision. For the Xception, it gave 91.3% accuracy, EfficientNetB0:91.1%, ResNet50: 85.0 %, VGG16: 68.0 %, DenseNet121: 87.0 % and for the InceptionV3, it gave 86.4 % precision respectively. Here, not every one of the algorithms performed well. Xception and EfficientNetB0 have the most noteworthy accuracy among these.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHasan Shahriar
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityProtick Sarker Shuvo
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMd. Saidul Haque Fahim
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMd Sobuj Sordar
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMd Esadul Haque
dc.format.extent35 pages
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrac Universityen_US
dc.rightsBrac University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
dc.subjectDeep learningen_US
dc.subjectCassava leafen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.subjectDecision treeen_US
dc.subjectXceptionen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.subjectEfficientNet B0en_US
dc.subjectResnet 50en_US
dc.subjectVGG16en_US
dc.subjectInception V3en_US
dc.subjectDenseNet 121en_US
dc.subject.lcshMachine learning
dc.subject.lcshCognitive learning theory (Deep learning)
dc.subject.lcshNeural networks (Computer science)
dc.titleCassava leaf disease classification using deep learning and convolutional neural network ensembleen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Brac University
dc.description.degreeB. Computer Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record