Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChang, Karen T.
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Puspita
dc.contributor.authorSarker, Malabika
dc.contributor.authorMontagu, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Nirali M.
dc.contributor.authorSprockett, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T07:49:30Z
dc.date.available2022-04-12T07:49:30Z
dc.date.copyright2020
dc.date.issued2020-07-13
dc.identifier.citationChang, K. T., Hossain, P., Sarker, M., Montagu, D., Chakraborty, N. M., & Sprockett, A. (2020). Translating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurement. Global Health Action, 13(1) doi:10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/16543
dc.descriptionThis article was published in Global Health Action [ © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956 The Journal's website is at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Improving facility-based quality for maternal and neonatal care is the key to reducing morbidity and mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries. Recent guidance from WHO and others has produced a large number of indicators to choose from to track quality. Objective: To explore how to translate complex global maternal and neonatal health standards into actionable application at the facility level. Methods: We applied a two-step process as an example of how the 352 indicators in WHO’s 2016 Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities might be reduced to only those with the strongest evidence base, associated with outcomes, and actionable by facility managers. We applied Hill criteria and assessed whether indicators were within the control of facility managers. We next conducted a rapid review of supporting literature and applied GRADE analysis, retaining those with scores of ‘moderate’ or ‘high’. To understand the utility and barriers to measuring this limited set of indicators in practice, we undertook a case study of hypothetical measurement application in two districts in Bangladesh, interviewing 25 clinicians, managers, and other stakeholders. Results: From the initial 352 indicators, 56 were retained. The 56 indicators were used as a base for interviews. Respondents emphasized the practical challenges to the use of complex guides and the need for parsimonious and actionable sets of quality indicators. Conclusions: This work offers one way to move towards a reduced quality indicator set, beginning from current WHO guidance. Despite study limitations, this work provides evidence of the need for reduced and evidence-based sets of quality indicators if guides are to be used to improve quality in practice. We hope that future research will build on and refine our efforts. Measuring quality effectively so that evidence guides and improves practice is the first step to assuring safe maternal and neonatal care.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956
dc.subjectQuality of careen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectMaternal healthen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal healthen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectLow- and middle-incomeen_US
dc.subjectBangladeshen_US
dc.titleTranslating international guidelines for use in routine maternal and neonatal healthcare quality measurementen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionPublished
dc.contributor.departmentBrac James P. Grant School of Public Health
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1783956
dc.relation.journalGlobal Health Action


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record