Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBandiera, Oriana
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Robin
dc.contributor.authorDas, Narayan Chandra
dc.contributor.authorGulesci, Selim
dc.contributor.authorRasul, Imran
dc.contributor.authorSulaiman, Munshi
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T05:17:25Z
dc.date.available2022-02-23T05:17:25Z
dc.date.copyright2017
dc.date.issued2017-03-20
dc.identifier.issn0033-5533
dc.identifier.issn1531-4650
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/16319
dc.descriptionThis article was published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics [© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the President and Fellows of Harvard College] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx003 The Article's website is at: https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/132/2/811/3075123?redirectedFrom=fulltexten_US
dc.description.abstractWe study how women's choices over labor activities in village economies correlate with poverty and whether enabling the poorest women to take on the activities of their richer counterparts can set them on a sustainable trajectory out of poverty. To do this we conduct a large-scale randomized control trial, covering over 21,000 households in 1,309 villages surveyed four times over a seven-year period, to evaluate a nationwide program in Bangladesh that transfers livestock assets and skills to the poorest women. At baseline, the poorest women mostly engage in low return and seasonal casual wage labor while wealthier women solely engage in livestock rearing. The program enables poor women to start engaging in livestock rearing, increasing their aggregate labor supply and earnings. This leads to asset accumulation (livestock, land, and business assets) and poverty reduction, both sustained after four and seven years. These gains do not crowd out the livestock businesses of noneligible households while the wages these receive for casual jobs increase as the poor reduce their labor supply. Our results show that (i) the poor are able to take on the work activities of the nonpoor but face barriers to doing so, and, (ii) one-off interventions that remove these barriers lead to sustainable poverty reduction.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford Academicen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/132/2/811/3075123?redirectedFrom=fulltext
dc.subjectBangladeshen_US
dc.subjectLabour marketen_US
dc.subjectPovertyen_US
dc.subjectWomen participationen_US
dc.titleLabor markets and poverty in village Economiesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionPublished
dc.contributor.departmentBRAC Institute of Governance and Development
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx003
dc.relation.journalThe Quarterly Journal of Economics


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record