Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNoor, Marufia
dc.contributor.authorMamun-ur-Rashid
dc.contributor.authorShihab, Abu Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorParveen, Rezvina
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Hasanur
dc.contributor.authorAli, Tariq
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T05:12:48Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T05:12:48Z
dc.date.issued2003-07
dc.identifier.citationNoor, M., Rashid, M. ur, Shihab, A. M., Parveen, R., Rahman, H., Ali, T., & Shahaduz Zaman. (2003, July). Process documentation of selecting the ultra poor for CFPR/TUP Programme. Research Reports (2003): Economic Studies, Vol – XIX, 27–102.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/13649
dc.description.abstractll1e targeting process for the CFPR/TUP programme aims to bring together diverse strands of knowledge on poverty (indigenous, local, programmatic and academic) in identifying and selecting CFPR/TUP beneficiaries (tvfatin and Halder 2002). The targeting process is, therefore, multi-staged and involves a variety of actors and processes. The targeting process has four stages. Through each stage of the targeting process, diverse streams of knowledge arc combined to identify a smaller and more defined sample from which ultra poor beneficiaries may be selected. The following are the targeting stages: Rapport Building PRA Meeting Survey and Preliminary Selection Final Selection Four researchers were trained in Dhaka in Process Documentation Research (PDR) specifically and Qualitative Research, generally. They were then sent to PDR sites around the country to document the various stages of the targeting process. In between March 19, 2003 and April 30, 2003, the researchers sent back 28 reports covering 108 events/activities/stages to the Head Office. These process documentation reports have been consolidated into this final report. The process documentation revealed the wealth and diversity of activities and interactions that constitute the various stages of the targeting process. We shall look at the trends and patterns in each of these stages separately, before commenting on the broader themes and issues that ha,·e emerged from the process documentation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED)en_US
dc.subjectProcess Documentation Research (PDR)en_US
dc.subjectCFPR/TUP Programmeen_US
dc.subjectUltra pooren_US
dc.subjectBRACen_US
dc.subject.lcshRural development--Bangladesh.
dc.subject.lcshRural poor--Bangladesh.
dc.titleProcess documentation of selecting the ultra poor for CFPR/TUP Programmeen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record