dc.contributor.author | Noor, Marufia | |
dc.contributor.author | Mamun-ur-Rashid | |
dc.contributor.author | Shihab, Abu Muhammad | |
dc.contributor.author | Parveen, Rezvina | |
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, Hasanur | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Tariq | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-21T05:12:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-21T05:12:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Noor, M., Rashid, M. ur, Shihab, A. M., Parveen, R., Rahman, H., Ali, T., & Shahaduz Zaman. (2003, July). Process documentation of selecting the ultra poor for CFPR/TUP Programme. Research Reports (2003): Economic Studies, Vol – XIX, 27–102. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/13649 | |
dc.description.abstract | ll1e targeting process for the CFPR/TUP programme aims to bring together diverse strands
of knowledge on poverty (indigenous, local, programmatic and academic) in identifying and
selecting CFPR/TUP beneficiaries (tvfatin and Halder 2002). The targeting process is,
therefore, multi-staged and involves a variety of actors and processes.
The targeting process has four stages. Through each stage of the targeting process, diverse
streams of knowledge arc combined to identify a smaller and more defined sample from
which ultra poor beneficiaries may be selected. The following are the targeting stages:
Rapport Building
PRA Meeting
Survey and Preliminary Selection
Final Selection
Four researchers were trained in Dhaka in Process Documentation Research (PDR)
specifically and Qualitative Research, generally. They were then sent to PDR sites around
the country to document the various stages of the targeting process. In between March 19,
2003 and April 30, 2003, the researchers sent back 28 reports covering 108
events/activities/stages to the Head Office. These process documentation reports have
been consolidated into this final report.
The process documentation revealed the wealth and diversity of activities and interactions
that constitute the various stages of the targeting process. We shall look at the trends and
patterns in each of these stages separately, before commenting on the broader themes and
issues that ha,·e emerged from the process documentation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED) | en_US |
dc.subject | Process Documentation Research (PDR) | en_US |
dc.subject | CFPR/TUP Programme | en_US |
dc.subject | Ultra poor | en_US |
dc.subject | BRAC | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Rural development--Bangladesh. | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Rural poor--Bangladesh. | |
dc.title | Process documentation of selecting the ultra poor for CFPR/TUP Programme | en_US |
dc.type | Research report | en_US |