dc.contributor.author | Zohir, Sajjad | |
dc.contributor.author | Matin, lmran | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-26T04:14:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-26T04:14:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zohir, S., & Matin, lmran. (2002, September). Wider impacts of microfinance institutions: towards defining the scope and methodology. Research Reports (2002): Economic Studies, Vol - XVIII, 180–226. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/13113 | |
dc.description.abstract | The theme of wider implications of microfinance institutions' interventions is a relatively
uncharted territory, though the term is alluded to quite frequently. The interest in this theme
has emerged out of a number of motivations. One important view underlying such
motivation is that the total impact of microfinance intervention is being underestimated
through the conventional impact studies. It is alleged that the latter do not take into account
of the possible positive externalities on spheres beyond households and the subsequent
feedback effects on both participant and non-participant households. This assumption, we
argue, is driven a conceptualization of total impact consisting of two mutually exclusive
impacts--- narrow and wide. Yet, we argue that, what is conventionally termed as 'narrow'
impacts can be perceived as a reduced form expression, incorporating all secondary effects
arising from households' (participants and non-participants) engagements with various
market and non-market institutions. Analytically then, it becomes difficult to pursue the
wider impact theme and yet recognize that individuals and households are the expected
beneficiaries of all program interventions. The first section in this paper discusses this problem and posits two alternative approaches
to define the scope of wider impacts. It is proposed that within a narrower perspective, one
may examine individuals' /households' multi-dimensional engagements at meso and macro
levels and assess the subsequent changes at these levels. This would be the logical first step
towards assessing wider impacts. This is not to undermine the need to assess the feedback
effects of 'wider' impacts on households, especially on the poor. However, as discussed in
the following sections, a shift in focus away from households to meso/macro levels
broadens the scope of wider impact theme. It allows exploring impact pathways and how
these interact with wider structures---many such issues do not immediately lead back to
households and are yet to be addressed seriously in the existing microfinance impact
assessment literature... | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BRAC | en_US |
dc.subject | Microfinance institutions | en_US |
dc.subject | Social impact | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Microcredit--Bangladesh. | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Rural development--Bangladesh. | |
dc.title | Wider impacts of microfinance institutions: towards defining the scope and methodology | en_US |
dc.type | Research report | en_US |