dc.contributor.author | Hossain, Md Zabed | |
dc.contributor.author | Mahmud, Shah Noor | |
dc.contributor.author | Jakariya, Md. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-20T08:18:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-20T08:18:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hossain, M. Z., Mahmud, S. N., & Jakariya, M. (2002, June). Building community based arsenic mitigation response capacity in four upazilas of Bangladesh. Research Reports (2002): Health Studies, Vol - XXXIII, 152–178. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/13038 | |
dc.description.abstract | BRAC in collaboration with DPHE and 'UNICEF implemented the project entitled "Building
community based arsenic mitigation response capacity" during July 2001 to June 2002 in four
upazilas named Barura, Haimchar, Bahanga, and Monirampur of Comilla, Chandpur, Faridpur,
and Jessore districts respectively. The objectives ofthe project are to (i) raise awareness among the
community (ii) determine the extent of arsenic contamination in all tubewell water in the project
areas; and (iii) develop resource maps of different villages of the project area to locate safe water
sources.
The activities executed in the project were creation awareness among the people through
training, workshop, formation of different types of arsenic mitigation committees, training for
tubewell testing and blanket tubewell testing, providing technical advice on safe water and
collation and dissemination of knowledge generated and lessons learnt.
At the upazila level, upazila project co-ordinator ofBRAC actively participated at upazila
monthly co-ordination meeting in order to appraise different stakeholders and government
officials about activities and progress on arsenic mitigation. BRAe provided quarterly report to
the co-ordination committee. A working committee was formed whereby local DPHE and BRAC
project personnel worked together to plan and review different project activities and its progress.
A total of85937 shallow tubewells, among those 21003,26339,3585 and 35010 in Bhanga,
Barura, Haimchar, and Monirampur upazilas respectively were tested. Among the four upazilas
the highest contamination was found in Bhanga (91 %) and the lowest was in Monirampur (51 %).
A total of 378 deep hand set tubewells were tested in the project areas. Among these deep hand
set tubewells only 14 (3.7%) were found to be contaminated with arsenic of above permissible
153
limit. In the four upazilas a total of 14989 irrigation wells were tested ofthose 70% were found
contaminated.
Field testing of the tubewells for arsenic was validated by laboratory analysis using AAS
(Atomic absorption spectrophotometry). It was found that the field testers did reasonably well in
testing the tubewells. The percentage of correctly tested tubewells (green-green and red-red) was
92% and 90-91 % respectively. There was no significant seasonal variation in concentration of
arsenic in tubewell water.
Achievement in fonnation of arsenic mitigation committees was 100% at the Upazila level to Ward
level in all the four upazilas. In case of fomlation ofY AMC achievement was from 84 to 100% in
the project areas. Success in fulfilling the target of organizing meeting in the committees ranged
from 63 to 95% in the villages of the project areas.
The following issues were encountered during the course of the project implementation below.
• Number of communication materials like routine card, flash card, leaflet, posters were not
adequate in number.
• Although training was arranged for the communication officers of the project but there was no
manual for using these materials in written fonn.
• Although the Imams of the mosques were found very vital in disseminating the messages on
arsenic it was not possible to give orientation and training due to inadequate logistics.
• The owners of the restaurant or the teashop were found erasing red paint of the tubewells which
were found arsenic and they marked those tubewells with green paints.
• In few cases the members of the committees did not work spontaneously since
there was no provision of incentive as they expected against their services. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED) | en_US |
dc.subject | Arsenic | en_US |
dc.subject | BRAC | en_US |
dc.subject | Four upazila | en_US |
dc.subject | Tubewells | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Water--Purification--Arsenic removal | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Drinking water -- Arsenic content -- Bangladesh. | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Arsenic -- Environmental aspects -- Bangladesh. | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Health, Nutrition, and Population Program (BRAC) | |
dc.title | Building community based arsenic mitigation response capacity in four upazilas of Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.type | Research report | en_US |