dc.contributor.author | Karim, Abdul | |
dc.contributor.author | Mohamed, Abdul Rashid | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-25T09:25:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-25T09:25:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10361/12254 | |
dc.description | This article was published in the The Qualitative Report [© 2019 The Qualitative Report] and the definite version is available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss3/2/ | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | English teachers in Bangladesh have undergone numerous training programs.
Both government-initiated and donor-sponsored training programs have been
in operation in Bangladesh. Government initiated institutions to train teachers
are Primary Training Institutes (PTIs) and Teacher Training Colleges (TTCs).
However, researchers seemed to label training provided by PTIs and TTCs as
inadequate. Bridging the gaps intrigued government of Bangladesh to devise
donor-aided training programs, including English Language Teaching
Improvement Project (ELTIP), English for Teaching, Teaching for English
(ETTE), Secondary Education Quality and Access Enhancement Project
(SEQAEP), Teaching Quality Improvement in Secondary Education Project
(TQI-SEP). Studies reported their potential failure to bring changes in English
teachers’ classroom practices. English in Action (EIA) was the last donorfunded project that incorporated school-based training program. The aim of the
study was to examine the impact of EIA training program on secondary-school
English teachers’ classroom practice in Bangladesh, drawing the questions in
relation to the elements learned in the training program and the elements
practiced in the training program. The present study undertook the Integrated
Approaches to Teacher Development suggested by Hargreaves and Fullan
(1992) and Reflective Model developed by Wallace (1991). This study adopted
phenomenological approach since it subsumed the experience of an activity or
concept from the participants’ perspective. Eight Participants were selected
who had been trained from EIA training program and who had experience of
participating in other donor-aided program, in the spirit of yielding the
uniqueness of EIA which informed the sustainability of this program. It had been
divulged that teachers learned a lot of activities that were related to English
language teaching. However, the present studies observed limited practice of
such activities in the classroom. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | © 2019 The Qualitative Report | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss3/2/ | |
dc.subject | English in Action (EIA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Teacher training | en_US |
dc.subject | Classroom practice | en_US |
dc.subject | English Language Teaching (ELT) | en_US |
dc.subject | Communicative activities | en_US |
dc.subject | Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) | en_US |
dc.subject | EFL | en_US |
dc.title | Examining the impact of an English in action training program on secondary-school English teachers’ classroom practice in Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | |
dc.contributor.department | Brac Institutes of Languages | |